What is Quantum Yield?
The IUPAC definition of quantum yield (Φ) is the number of a certain event occurring per photon absorbed by the system,1
However, it is most commonly written specifically for the emission of light (photoluminescence) by a system,2-5
This narrower definition is often simply called quantum yield; with the emission of light being implicit given the context. However, the terms fluorescence, luminescence and photoluminescence quantum yield are also commonly used. The quantum yield is reported as either a decimal fraction between 0 and 1 or as a percentage. For example, if the system absorbs 100 photons and emits 30, then its quantum yield would be is 0.3 or 30%.
Figure 1: Quantum yield and radiative and non-radiative decay processes.
The quantum yield of a system (such as a fluorescent molecule) is determined by the balance between the radiative and non-radiative transition rates within it (Figure 1). The quantum yield can therefore be rewritten in terms of these rates,
The radiative transition rate () denotes radiative (light emitting) processes such as fluorescence and phosphorescence whereas the sum of non-radiative rates (), includes processes such as internal conversion, intersystem crossing, and energy transfer.6 The quantum yield is therefore the probability that a system in the excited state deactivates through a radiative process to its ground state.
History of Quantum Yield
The roots of quantum yield can be traced back to the beginning of the 20th century when Einstein’s revolutionary work on the photoelectric effect was published in 1905 (a copy of his paper translated in English can be found in Ref. 7). Einstein introduced the quantisation of light, i.e., a light beam consists of discrete quantum particles (quanta) carrying energy equal to , where is Planck’s constant and the light frequency. A few years later, E. G. Warburg published a series of papers over the period 1912-1921 in which he studied the conversion of ozone molecules into oxygen to acquire the ratio of the molecules produced to quanta absorbed. He later named this procedure “quantum efficiency” and used the Greek letter phi (Φ) to denote it.8 His papers (in German) can be found on the German National Library website.9 In 1924, Vavilov referred to the term “fluorescence yield”, based on Warburg’s earlier work, to calculate the fraction of absorbed rays of light to fluorescent rays of light,10 whereas the term “molecules per quantum light absorbed” appears in a paper published in 1925 by Marshall to describe the photochemical reaction between hydrogen and chlorine.11 By 1930 the term “quantum yield” as we know it today had been widely cited in a large number of textbooks and papers.
How to Measure Quantum Yield?
Quantum yield is one of the most important photophysical parameters when characterising luminescent molecules and materials. High quantum yields are crucial for a wide range of applications including; displays, lasers, bioimaging and solar cells, and accurate measurement of the quantum yield is therefore important. Quantum yield measurements can be split into non-optical and optical methods. Non-optical methods include the indirect measurement of the conversion of the excitation energy into heat and its dissipation to the solvent,6, 12 and calorimetric methods, such as photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS),13 and thermal lensing.14 These methods require specialised setups and are generally reserved for the determination of the quantum yield of important standards. Quantum yields are therefore most commonly measured optically, using either the relative or absolute method.
Relative Quantum Yield Method
In the relative quantum yield method, the quantum yield of the sample interest is calculated by comparing its photoluminescence emission to that of a reference standard of known quantum yield. In conventional fluorescence spectrometers only a certain fraction of the emitted light is collected and detected; with the size of the fraction depending on numerous factors. These factors include; the angular distribution (solid angle) of the emitted photons, the refractive index of the solvent, wavelength, the scattering properties of the sample and sample geometry.6, 12 The fraction is, therefore, impossible to accurately quantify which prevents direct measurement of the quantum yield. The relative method overcomes this problem by using a reference standard of known quantum yield and similar optical properties to those of the sample. The emission spectra of the sample and reference standard are measured under identical excitation conditions and the ratio of the integrated emission used to calculate the quantum yield of the sample.
Figure 2: FS5 Spectrofluorometer equipped with the SC-05 Standard Cuvette Holder.
The advantage of the relative method is that it can be readily applied using standard commercial absorption and fluorescence spectrometers equipped with a simple cuvette holder (Figure 2). The downside is that a reference standard must exist that emits in a similar wavelength region to the sample, and the sample type is generally limited to transparent liquids.
Absolute Quantum Yield Method
In the absolute quantum yield method, an integrating sphere is used to capture all light emitted by the sample, avoiding the need for a reference standard. The quantum yield is determined by comparing the number of emitted photons with the number of absorbed photons. The advantage of the absolute method is that no reference standard is required which results in a faster measurement of the quantum yield (since fewer measurements are required) and a broader range of emission wavelengths are accessible that are no longer limited to where reference standards exist. Secondly, the absolute method can also be applied to a much larger range of sample types and is the only reliable method for samples such as scattering solids. The downside is that an integrating sphere is required for the measurement, however, these have become increasingly common and are now available as accessories for benchtop fluorescence spectrometers (Figure 3).
Figure 3: FS5 Spectrofluorometer equipped with the SC-30 Integrating Sphere.
Technical notes on how to measure the absolute quantum yield of liquid and powder samples using the FLS1000’s integrating sphere, and application notes on measuring the temperature-dependent absolute quantum yield of halide perovskites and plant leaves can be found on our website.
- Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the “Gold Book”), Compiled by A. D. McNaught and A. Wilkinson, Accessed August 2021
- K. -L. Wong, J. -C. G. Bünzli, P. A. Tanner, Quantum yield and brightness, J. Lumin., 2020, 224, 117256
- D. M. Jameson, Introduction to Fluorescence. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2014
- Lakowicz JR. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 3rd ed. Springer New York; 2006.
- B. Valeur, M. N. Berberan-Santos. Molecular Fluorescence: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2012.
- M. Levitus, Tutorial: Measurement of fluorescence spectra and determination of relative fluorescence quantum yields of transparent samples, Methods Appl. Fluoresc., 2020, 8 033001
- A. Einstein, On a heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light. Ann. Phys. 1905, 17, English Translation
- M. B. Rubin, S. E. Braslavsky. Quantum yield: The term and the symbol. A historical search. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2010, 9, 670-674
- E. Warburg papers, DNB, Katalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek.
- S. J. Wawilow, Die Fluoreszenzausbeute von Farbstofflösungen, Zeitschrift für Phys, 1924, 22, 266-272
- A. L. Marshall, Mechanism of the Photochemical Reaction between Hydrogen and Chlorine. III, J Phys Chem., 1926, 30, 757-762.
- C. Würth, M. Grabolle, J. Pauli, M. Spieles, U. Resch-Genger, Relative and absolute determination of fluorescence quantum yields of transparent samples. Nat Protoc. 2013, 8,1535-1550
- M. G. Rockley, K. M. Waugh, The photoacoustic determination of fluorescence yields of dye solutions, Chem Phys Lett., 1978, 54, 597-599
- M. Fischer, J. Georges, Fluorescence quantum yield of rhodamine 6G in ethanol as a function of concentration using thermal lens spectrometry, Chem Phys Lett. 1996, 260, 115-118