Detection of Singlet Oxygen | Technical Note | Edinburgh Instruments

Detection of Singlet Oxygen

Detection of Singlet Oxygen is of particular interest in a multitude of applications such as photodynamic treatment of cancer1, fine chemical synthesis2 and treatment of wastewater.3

1O2 shows a weak emission band at ~1270 nm with a natural bandwidth of approximately 18 nm. As the ground state of molecular oxygen is a triplet state, direct excitation, by the absorption of light, into the first excited singlet state is not possible. Therefore 1O2 is often generated by chemical reactions or by photosensitisation, i.e. light is absorbed by other photoactive dyes that will be able to transfer the absorbed energy via their triplet states to the molecular oxygen.

As the signal at 1270 nm is so weak, detection of the 1O2 emission has always been challenging. Germanium and InGaAs detectors were used in the past, but predominantly for steady state applications. Lifetime applications were very limited indeed, due to the further reduction of signal amplitude when the RC constant of the detector had to be kept low to achieve the necessary temporal resolution. Nowadays, photomultipliers (PMT) are available with sensitivity to 1400 nm and beyond. This greatly facilitates both steady state and lifetime measurements of 1O2.

Even with modern detectors, it is essential to have a powerful excitation source and an efficient optical system. The FLS980 is the ideal spectrometer for this application.

Methods and Materials for Detection of Singlet Oxygen

Emission spectra were measured in a FLS980 Fluorescence Spectrometer equipped with a 450 W Xe lamp, a 60 W microsecond flashlamp, and single monochromators. A 400 nm blazed grating was used at the excitation and a 1200 nm blazed grating at the emission arm.

An NIR-PMT (Hamamatsu, R5509-72) with 0.5 s, 4 repeats and a two-stage TE cooled InGaAs detector (Hamamatsu, G8605-23) with 0.1 s dwell and 20 repeats were used, both resulting in 2 s integration time. Higher diffraction orders were filtered by the built-in long wave-pass filters in the FLS980.

Samples of Erythrosine B (Sigma-Aldrich, 19,826-9) dissolved in anhydrous ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, 459836) and tris(2,2’-bipyridyl)dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate Ru(bpy)3 (Sigma-Aldrich, 544981) dissolved in D2O (Sigma-Aldrich,151882) were prepared air saturated with optical density (OD) 0.5 and 0.35, respectively. The Ru(bpy)3 sample was additionally saturated with oxygen for approximately 10 minutes.

All samples were measured in quartz cuvettes of 10 mm path-length in right angle geometry. The Ru(bpy)3 samples were excited at the absorption peak of 450 nm, while the Erythrosine B at 530 nm with excitation and emission bandwidths of 15 nm.

To allow for direct comparison of the spectra between different detectors, the data were noise normalised by applying a scaling equal to the noise ratio at 1360 nm – 1400 nm, that is f=INIR-PMT(λ)/IInGaAs(λ), and consequently offset vertically.

Steady-State Emission

The 1O2 emission spectra displayed in Figure 1 were measured with a) an NIRPMT and b) an InGaAs detector. The 1O2 emission around 1270 nm generated by erythrosin shows a single emission peak, however in Ru(bpy)3 the 1O2 emission is overlapped by the emission tail of the sensitizer molecule. It can also be seen in Figure 1b that, for the O2 saturated sample, the background emission is reduced due to the quenching of the triplet state4 , as has been observed in Ru(bpy)3 in aqueous solutions.5

Emission Spectra- Singlet Oxygen

Figure 1: Emission spectra of 1O2 in Erythrosin B and Ru(bpy)3 under λexc=530 nm and λexc=450 nm, respectively, obtained with a) NIR-PMT and b) InGaAs detectors. The experimental conditions were Δλexc=Δλem=15 nm, integration time 2 s/step and step of 1 nm for all samples.

The estimated signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the 1O2 emission generated from erythrosin B is 195 for the NIR-PMT and 45 for the InGaAs. The difference in the SNR is a result of integration, quantum efficiency, active area, sensitivity and different sources of noise in the detectors:

  1. Noise. The NIR-PMT is a single photon counting detector. Working in this mode means that the only source of noise is photon noise (Poisson noise) which is the square root of the measured signal (or more specifically square root of signal plus detector dark counts). The InGaAs detector has a lock-in amplifier to minimise noise fluctuations and so will be noise limited by the noise equivalent power (NEP).
  2. Sensitivity: The difference in sensitivity between single photon counting and analogue detection, in particular the fact that single photon counting is intrinsically digital and only accepts signal counts above a noise floor.
  3. Active area. The NIR-PMT has an active area of 24 mm compared to 3 mm for a standard InGaAs chip. For small monochromator slits this will not have an impact, but for weak samples, when the monochromator slits are opened so that the focus on the detector is larger than the active area, the increase in sensitivity will be limited.
  4. Quantum efficiency. The InGaAs detector actually has almost 2 orders of magnitude higher quantum efficiency than the NIR-PMT at 1270 nm which additionally depends on the operating temperature of each detector.
  5. Integration. The analogue detection works with an integration time that is set by the electrical circuit, whereas with single photon counting the integration time is directly set by the length of time the individual photons are counted.

The higher source of noise inherent in an analogue detector means that the NIR-PMT will have a higher SNR and therefore be more sensitive at 1270 nm, even though the InGaAs may have higher quantum efficiency.

In order to obtain a direct comparison of the 1O2 signal obtained by the two detectors, the emission spectra of 1O2 from erythrosin B in Figure 1 have been noise normalised and are displayed in Figure 2.

Detection of Singlet Oxygen

Figure 2: Emission spectra of 1O2 in Erythrosin B obtained by NIR-PMT and InGaAs detectors. The spectra have been scaled to equal noise and offset, to allow for direct comparison between detectors.

Time Resolved Emission of Singlet Oxygen

Although the emission spectrum of 1O2 can be measured with InGaAs detectors, the measurement of its lifetime requires a photon counting detector. For this reason, the decay of 1O2 monitored at 1270 nm was measured with an NIR-PMT and is displayed in Figure 3. It can be seen that the exponential fit resulted in a lifetime of 15.3 μs for 1O2 from Erythrosin B in ethanol and 59.47 μs for Ru(bpy)3 in D2O, in agreement with reported decay values.6

Detection of Singlet Oxygen- Figure 3

Figure 3: Lifetime decay of a) Erythrosin B in Ethanol and b) Ru(bpy)3 in D2O.

The time-resolved emission spectra (TRES) can be obtained from time-resolved scans across the emission of 1O2. In this way, the emission of 1O2 can be distinguished from phosphorescence emitted by the sensitiser. The emission spectra generated by Ru(bpy)3 are displayed in Figure 4 from 200 μs to 400 μs, with a step of 20 μs.

Figure 4 - Detection of Singlet Oxygen

Figure 4: Time-resolved emission spectra (TRES) of 1O2 generated from Ru(bpy)3.

Steady-state and time-resolved emission spectra of 1O2 generated by Erythrosin B and Ru(bpy)3 are reported in this technical note. In addition, the lifetimes were fitted in single exponentials and are in good agreement with reported lifetime values. It can be concluded that both steady-state and time-resolved measurements of 1O2 can be obtained with single photon counting detectors such as NIR-PMT, while InGaAs detectors can be used for steady-state measurements.


1. Bonnett, Raymond. „Photosensitizers of the porphyrin and phthalocyanine series for photodynamic therapy.“ Chemical Society Reviews 24.1 (1995): 19-33.

2. DeRosa, Maria C., and Robert J. Crutchley. „Photosensitized singlet oxygen and its applications.“ Coordination Chemistry Reviews 233 (2002): 351-371.

2. Esser, Peter, Bettina Pohlmann, and HansDieter Scharfet. „Die photochemische Synthese von Feinchemikalien mit Sonnenlicht.“ Angewandte Chemie 106.20 (1994): 2093-2108.

3. Schweitzer, Claude, and Reinhard Schmidt. „Physical mechanisms of generation and deactivation of singlet oxygen.“ Chemical reviews 103.5 (2003): 1685-1758.

4. Winterle, John S., David S. Kliger, and George S. Hammond. „Mechanisms of photochemical reactions in solution. 80. Photochemical oxidation of tris (2, 2′-bipyridyl) ruthenium (II) by molecular oxygen.“ Journal of the American Chemical Society 98.12 (1976): 3719-3721.

5. Wilkinson, F., Helman, W. P. & Ross, A. B. Rate Constants for the Decay and Reactions of the Lowest Electronically Excited Singlet State of Molecular Oxygen in Solution. An Expanded and Revised Compilation. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 24, 663–677 (1995).

Products for the Detection of Singlet Oxygen

Emission spectra were measured using an FLS980 Fluorescence Spectrometer. Our FLS980 has now been discontinued but we are still able to offer upgrades to those with existing systems. Our FLS1000 Photoluminescence Spectrometer has replaced the FLS980, and sets the standard in both steady state and time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy for fundamental research and routine laboratory applications. To find out about upgrades for an existing FLS980 system, or to enquire about our FLS1000, contact a member of our sales team at

Download the full Singlet Oxygen Technical Note

Detection of Singlet Oxygen

Stay in Touch

If you have enjoyed reading this Technical Note, and want to be the first to see the latest news, application, and product information from Edinburgh Instruments, sign-up to our infrequent newsletter via the red sign-up button below, and follow us on social media.